Best Ahrefs Alternatives
Ahrefs is the gold standard for backlink data but the price is steep. These alternatives offer solid SEO capabilities at different price points.
5 alternatives compared, ranked by how well they replace Ahrefs.
Best for broader digital marketing including PPC research
The all-in-one SEO platform used by 10 million marketers worldwide.
#2 — Moz Pro
4.34.3 out of 5 starsBest beginner-friendly alternative with Domain Authority
Trusted SEO software with Domain Authority and an approachable interface.
#3 — Mangools
4.44.4 out of 5 starsBest budget alternative for keyword research
A suite of five beginner-friendly SEO tools at one affordable price.
#4 — Surfer SEO
4.54.5 out of 5 starsBest alternative for content-focused SEO optimisation
AI-powered content optimisation that tells you exactly what to write.
#5 — Ubersuggest
4.04.0 out of 5 starsBest cheapest entry point for basic SEO
Affordable SEO tool with keyword research traffic estimates and site audits.
Where Ahrefs starts to hurt
Ahrefs earns its reputation. Its backlink index is the reason professional SEOs put up with the cost, and nothing on this page matches it for link data. The trouble is that the entry plan is priced for people who do SEO for a living, there is no free tier of the full toolset to grow into, and the practical limits — tracked keywords, projects, reports, exports — push you up the tiers faster than you expect once you manage more than one site.
The other common reason for leaving is scope. Ahrefs is deliberately an SEO tool. If your job also covers paid search, competitor ad copy or content production workflow, you end up paying for a specialist platform and then buying a second subscription anyway.
The criteria that matter
How much backlink depth do you really use?
Be honest about this before you shop on price. If you build links, audit toxic profiles or reverse-engineer competitors' link strategies, index size and crawl freshness are the whole product and cutting costs here will cost you accuracy. If you glance at referring domains once a quarter, you are paying a premium for a capability you barely touch.
Keyword and SERP data for your market
Search volumes are estimates, and every platform models them differently from its own index and clickstream sources. The figures will not agree, so the question is which tool is closest to reality in your language and country. Test it: run a batch of keywords you already rank for through a trial and see which estimates track the impressions your own search analytics report.
Research versus optimisation
These are separate categories that get compared as though they were one. Research tools tell you which keywords and links exist. Content optimisation tools tell you what to put on the page to compete for them. A tool built for the second job will not replace Ahrefs, and buying it under that assumption is the most common mistake on this list.
Cost per person, not cost per plan
Most SEO platforms include one or two seats and charge for the rest. If three people need access, compare the total for three seats across your shortlist rather than the advertised headline price. Also check what happens to your saved projects and reports if you downgrade — some plans keep the data but hide it until you upgrade again.
Picking by scenario
If you want breadth rather than savings, Semrush is the swap. It covers keyword and backlink research plus advertising data, which makes it the better fit when SEO is one part of a wider marketing remit. Note that its entry plan is not cheaper than the one you are leaving, so treat this as a change of scope, not a cost cut.
Moz Pro is the gentler option and the easiest to justify to a team that does not live in SEO tools. Domain Authority is still the metric clients and colleagues recognise, and the interface asks less of a beginner than either Ahrefs or Semrush.
Mangools is where the real saving is. For keyword research, SERP analysis and rank tracking on a modest number of sites, five focused tools at one low monthly price cover the work most freelancers and small businesses actually do.
Surfer SEO belongs on your shortlist only if your bottleneck is content rather than discovery. It tells you what to write and how to structure it, which is genuinely useful — but it sits alongside a research tool rather than replacing one. Ubersuggest is the cheapest way to keep some capability while you decide; it carries the lowest rating here, so use its numbers as a rough guide rather than a source of truth.
Switching costs to plan for
Rank tracking history is the thing you lose. Every platform starts measuring from the day you add a keyword, so set up your tracked terms in the new tool before you cancel the old one and let them run in parallel for a few weeks. That overlap also gives you a fair comparison of the two data sets on keywords you know well.
Export anything you will want to reference later. Backlink snapshots, historical position graphs, crawl and audit results and keyword lists all vanish with the subscription. A dated CSV of your current link profile is worth keeping regardless of where you land.
Check integrations and limits against the specific plan you intend to buy. API access, extra seats, additional projects and higher export caps are commonly add-ons or higher tiers, and a tool that is cheaper on paper can end up costing more once you have restored the limits you were used to. Start on monthly billing rather than committing to a year on a platform whose data you have not yet stress-tested.
The bottom line
If the price is the problem and your work is keyword-led, Mangools is the pragmatic replacement and the saving is real. If you need comparable breadth and can absorb the cost, Semrush is the only genuine like-for-like on this page. Add Surfer SEO alongside either one if writing pages, not finding them, is where you actually lose time.